Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High)

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol (High)On the frontier
Intelligence
50.20
Total cost
$521
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.150.2+283.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 3.8× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$521.32— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)5.32s73.30s+1277.8% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 1277.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.12 / $0.40$2.00 / $10.0
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6.1 Sol (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill