Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (Low)
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) | gpt-oss-120b (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 10.2 | −22.1% gpt-oss-120b (Low) is 22.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.32s | 10.02s | +88.3% gpt-oss-120b (Low) is 88.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.12 / $0.40 | $0.13 / $0.59 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill