Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 46.4 | +254.2% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 3.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $4,967.35 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.51s | 46.09s | +736.5% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 736.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.12 / $0.40 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill