Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 7.0 | −46.6% Mistral Small 3.2 is 46.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $121.78 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.57s | 10.52s | +88.9% Mistral Small 3.2 is 88.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.12 / $0.40 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill