Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High)

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Glimmer (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
17.50
Total cost
$146
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)Muse Glimmer (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.117.5+33.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 33.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$145.77— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)5.57s25.25s+353.3% Muse Glimmer (High) is 353.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.12 / $0.40$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itMuse Glimmer (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill