Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Reka Flash 3
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Reka Flash 3. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) | Reka Flash 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 5.6 | −57.3% Reka Flash 3 is 57.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.57s | 29.82s | +435.4% Reka Flash 3 is 435.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.12 / $0.40 | $0.20 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/reka-flash-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/reka-flash-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill