Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Low)

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.3 (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
34.30
Total cost
$1013
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)GLM-5.3 (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.734.3+105.4% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 2.1× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,012.50— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.38s31.40s+10.6% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 10.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.3 (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/glm-5-3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/glm-5-3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill