Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4o mini

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4o mini. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-4o miniNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)GPT-4o miniDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.76.7−59.9% GPT-4o mini is 59.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.38s5.60s−80.3% GPT-4o mini is 80.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-4o mini: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/gpt-4o-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/gpt-4o-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill