Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.7 | 24.1 | +44.3% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 44.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,524.02 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.83s | 109.06s | +278.3% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 278.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.34 | $0.75 / $4.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill