Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Non-reasoning)
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) | GPT-5.4 nano (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.7 | 11.7 | −29.9% GPT-5.4 nano (Non-rea… is 29.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.17s | 3.62s | −86.7% GPT-5.4 nano (Non-rea… is 86.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.34 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/gpt-5-4-nano-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/gpt-5-4-nano-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill