Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (Minimal)

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (Minimal). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5 nano (Minimal)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)GPT-5 nano (Minimal)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.77.1−57.5% GPT-5 nano (Minimal) is 57.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)27.17s4.19s−84.6% GPT-5 nano (Minimal) is 84.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$0.05 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-5 nano (Minimal): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/gpt-5-nano-minimal · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/gpt-5-nano-minimal?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill