Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 3B

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 3B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
IBMGranite 4.2 3BOn the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
9.10
Total cost
$14.9
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Granite 4.2 3BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.79.1−45.5% Granite 4.2 3B is 45.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$14.91— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.38s49.98s+76.1% Granite 4.2 3B is 76.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$0.03 / $0.12
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itGranite 4.2 3B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/granite-4-2-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/granite-4-2-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill