Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Mercury 2.5
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Mercury 2.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) | Mercury 2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.7 | 12.3 | −26.3% Mercury 2.5 is 26.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $218.11 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.38s | 4.18s | −85.3% Mercury 2.5 is 85.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.34 | $0.25 / $0.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/mercury-2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/mercury-2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill