Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)MiniMax-M2Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.718.6+11.4% MiniMax-M2 is 11.4% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.53s26.29s−7.9% MiniMax-M2 is 7.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M2: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/minimax-m2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/minimax-m2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill