Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.1

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.1Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)MiniMax-M2.1Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.720.9+25.1% MiniMax-M2.1 is 25.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.38s44.37s+56.3% MiniMax-M2.1 is 56.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M2.1: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/minimax-m2-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/minimax-m2-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill