Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3.1-FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
42.70
Total cost
$283
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.742.7+155.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$283.18— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)27.67s22.62s−18.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 18.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M3.1-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill