Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
MistralMistral Small 3.2Off the frontier
Intelligence
7.00
Total cost
$122
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Mistral Small 3.2Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.77.0−58.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 58.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$121.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.83s11.35s−60.6% Mistral Small 3.2 is 60.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$0.07 / $0.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itMistral Small 3.2: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill