Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High)

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Glimmer (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
17.50
Total cost
$146
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Muse Glimmer (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.717.5+4.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 4.8% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$145.77— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.83s24.79s−14.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 14.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itMuse Glimmer (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill