Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.7 | 26.5 | +58.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 58.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $282.51 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.17s | 6.20s | −77.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 77.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.34 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill