Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs o3

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs o3. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
OpenAIo3Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)o3Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.720.2+21.0% o3 is 21.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)30.07s11.00s−63.4% o3 is 63.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$2.00 / $8.00
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats ito3: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/o3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/o3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill