Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 (Xhigh)

Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.4 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
39.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.4 (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.939.0+180.6% GPT-5.4 (Xhigh) is 2.8× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.00s137.54s+1150.4% GPT-5.4 (Xhigh) is 1150.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.17 / $0.40$2.50 / $15.0
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.4 (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/gpt-5-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/gpt-5-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill