Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 8B

Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 8B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
IBMGranite 4.2 8BOff the frontier
Intelligence
11.10
Total cost
$53.1
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Granite 4.2 8BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.911.1−20.1% Granite 4.2 8B is 20.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$53.07— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.57s46.99s+344.6% Granite 4.2 8B is 344.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.17 / $0.40$0.06 / $0.25
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGranite 4.2 8B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/granite-4-2-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/granite-4-2-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill