Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Inkling (Xhigh)

Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Inkling (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
Thinking MachinesInkling (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
25.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Inkling (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.925.0+79.9% Inkling (Xhigh) is 79.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.10s14.41s+29.8% Inkling (Xhigh) is 29.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.17 / $0.40$1.00 / $4.05
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image, Speech
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning): what beats itInkling (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/inkling · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/inkling?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill