Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Ling-3.0-flash-VL

Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Ling-3.0-flash-VL. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing-3.0-flash-VLNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Ling-3.0-flash-VLDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.924.6+77.0% Ling-3.0-flash-VL is 77.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.57sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.17 / $0.40—
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning): what beats itLing-3.0-flash-VL: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/ling-3-0-flash-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/ling-3-0-flash-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill