Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4

Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Phi-4Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.95.9−57.6% Phi-4 is 57.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.80s14.64s+49.4% Phi-4 is 49.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.14 / $0.40$0.13 / $0.50
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning): what beats itPhi-4: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/phi-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/phi-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill