Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)

Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8 27B (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.20
Total cost
$1165
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.926.2+88.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 88.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,164.93— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.93s58.18s+432.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 432.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.17 / $0.40$0.50 / $3.00
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.8 27B (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill