Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) vs Inkling 2 Small

Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) vs Inkling 2 Small. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 31B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
4.40
Total cost
-
Thinking MachinesInkling 2 SmallOff the frontier
Intelligence
30.60
Total cost
$792
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 31B (Reasoning)Inkling 2 SmallDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)4.430.6+595.5% Inkling 2 Small is 7.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$791.81— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)64.21s20.92s−67.4% Inkling 2 Small is 67.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.00 / $0.00$0.30 / $1.00
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 31B (Reasoning): what beats itInkling 2 Small: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b/inkling-2-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b/inkling-2-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill