Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)

Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
47.00
Total cost
$3465
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.547.0+623.1% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 7.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$3,464.84— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported91.96s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$4.00 / $20.0
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.6 Sol (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b-non-reasoning/gpt-5-6-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b-non-reasoning/gpt-5-6-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill