Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)

Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)On the frontier
Intelligence
34.60
Total cost
$66.8
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.534.6+432.3% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 5.3× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$66.81— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported21.92s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$0.10 / $0.50
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill