Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)

Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
-
SpaceXAIGrok 4.7 (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
42.20
Total cost
$1631
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.7 (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.542.2+549.2% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 6.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,630.69— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported11.28s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGrok 4.7 (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b-non-reasoning/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b-non-reasoning/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill