Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct

Gemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.512.0+84.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 84.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported11.36s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$0.21 / $0.84
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E2B (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b-non-reasoning/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b-non-reasoning/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill