Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E2B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3.1-FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
42.70
Total cost
$283
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E2B (Reasoning)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.842.7+447.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 5.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$283.18— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported25.34s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E2B (Reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M3.1-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill