Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B

Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E2B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen2.5 Instruct 32BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E2B (Reasoning)Qwen2.5 Instruct 32BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.86.9−11.5% Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B is 11.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E2B (Reasoning): what beats itQwen2.5 Instruct 32B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b/qwen2.5-32b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e2b/qwen2.5-32b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill