Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.3-FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.80
Total cost
$306
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)GLM-5.3-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.541.8+457.3% GLM-5.3-Flash is 5.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$305.52— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.53s38.89s+237.3% GLM-5.3-Flash is 237.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.15 / $0.50
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.3-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/glm-5-3-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/glm-5-3-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill