Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-4.1 nano

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-4.1 nano. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-4.1 nanoNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)GPT-4.1 nanoDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.57.8+4.0% GPT-4.1 nano is 4.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.53s2.96s−74.3% GPT-4.1 nano is 74.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.10 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-4.1 nano: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/gpt-4-1-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/gpt-4-1-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill