Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Low)
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.5 | 21.0 | +180.0% GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $27.02 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.87s | 5.90s | −50.3% GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is 50.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/gpt-5-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/gpt-5-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill