Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (Low)

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)gpt-oss-120b (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.510.2+36.0% gpt-oss-120b (Low) is 36.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.87s10.19s−14.2% gpt-oss-120b (Low) is 14.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.13 / $0.59
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill