Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.5 | 14.0 | +86.7% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 86.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $250.37 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.53s | 5.93s | −48.6% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 48.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/grok-4-3-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/grok-4-3-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill