Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Jamba 1.7 Large

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Jamba 1.7 Large. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
AI21 LabsJamba 1.7 LargeNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Jamba 1.7 LargeDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.56.1−18.7% Jamba 1.7 Large is 18.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.06sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10—
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itJamba 1.7 Large: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/jamba-1-7-large · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/jamba-1-7-large?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill