Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.5 | 55.1 | +634.7% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 7.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $3,117.31 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.06s | 44.78s | +304.9% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 304.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill