Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.5 | 41.1 | +448.0% Ling 3.1 Flash is 5.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,014.56 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.06s | 13.64s | +23.3% Ling 3.1 Flash is 23.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill