Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 4 Scout

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 4 Scout. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
MetaLlama 4 ScoutOff the frontier
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
$73.6
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Llama 4 ScoutDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.56.5−13.3% Llama 4 Scout is 13.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$73.56— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.06s5.16s−53.3% Llama 4 Scout is 53.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.18 / $0.66
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itLlama 4 Scout: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill