Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Magistral Small 1.2

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Magistral Small 1.2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
MistralMagistral Small 1.2Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Magistral Small 1.2Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.58.6+14.7% Magistral Small 1.2 is 14.7% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.53s33.47s+190.3% Magistral Small 1.2 is 190.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.50 / $1.50
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itMagistral Small 1.2: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/magistral-small-2509 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/magistral-small-2509?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill