Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.5

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.5Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M2.5Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.522.8+204.0% MiniMax-M2.5 is 3.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.06s42.67s+285.8% MiniMax-M2.5 is 285.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M2.5: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/minimax-m2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/minimax-m2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill