Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.5 | 7.1 | −5.3% Mistral Small 3.1 is 5.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $27.82 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.06s | 11.78s | +6.5% Mistral Small 3.1 is 6.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill