Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max)

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Wonder (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
52.40
Total cost
$5787
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Muse Wonder (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.552.4+598.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 7.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$5,786.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.06s41.43s+274.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 274.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$4.00 / $20.0
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image, Speech, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itMuse Wonder (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill