Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs o4-mini (High)

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs o4-mini (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
OpenAIo4-mini (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)o4-mini (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.516.7+122.7% o4-mini (High) is 2.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.06s28.44s+157.1% o4-mini (High) is 157.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$1.10 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats ito4-mini (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/o4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/o4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill