Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Phi-4Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.55.9−21.3% Phi-4 is 21.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.06s15.44s+39.6% Phi-4 is 39.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.13 / $0.50
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itPhi-4: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/phi-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/phi-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill