Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.5 | 26.7 | +256.0% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 3.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.53s | 16.87s | +46.3% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 46.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.11 / $0.33 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill