Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Reka Flash 3

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Reka Flash 3. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
Reka AIReka Flash 3Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Reka Flash 3Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.55.6−25.3% Reka Flash 3 is 25.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.06s29.84s+169.8% Reka Flash 3 is 169.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.20 / $0.80
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itReka Flash 3: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/reka-flash-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/reka-flash-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill